Governor Deval Patrick's Budget Recommendation - House 2 Fiscal Year 2011

Governor's Budget Recommendation FY 2011

Health Care


Governor Patrick’s and Lieutenant Governor Murray’s fiscal year 2011 budget proposal maintains our commitment to the Commonwealth’s historic health care reform initiative.  The Administration has implemented an innovative, thoughtful legislative vision which has transformed the way that the Commonwealth’s residents access health care and has made Massachusetts a national model for how to expand coverage to virtually all of our residents.  Today, over 97 percent of our residents have health insurance.

Health care reform in Massachusetts is an unprecedented initiative to expand health insurance coverage.  Nowhere in the nation had policies like an individual mandate or minimum creditable coverage been tried or tested prior to health care reform in our state.  A groundbreaking legislative framework delegated key implementation decisions to state and independent agencies led by the Administration – with success requiring expert policy judgment and the ability to maintain support among a diverse coalition of stakeholders.

Since Governor Patrick took office in 2007, he has committed himself and his Administration to making health care reform a success.  Within weeks of taking office, he was on the phone with health plan executives demanding and delivering lower rates for our residents – and filing a budget making significant investments in health care reform.  He secured an extension of our Medicaid waiver that expanded our ability to leverage federal support for health care reform.  Last year, he led a successful charge to include additional Medicaid matching funds in federal stimulus legislation.  Through his Administration’s role on the Connector Board, the Governor has navigated some of health care reform’s most challenging policy decisions – in particular, launching an “individual mandate” that produced gains in coverage without fracturing the health care reform coalition.

Thanks to these efforts – and the continuing commitment of the Legislature and a diverse coalition of stakeholders – health care reform in Massachusetts has been a tremendous success.  Over 97 percent of our state’s residents have health insurance, with gains in coverage that have given us the highest rates of insurance in the nation.  Coverage levels have held steady even in the midst of a dramatic national economic downturn – a testament to the wisdom of the statutory framework for reform and the Administration’s sure and steady approach to implementation.

Percentage of Massachusetts Residents Without Health Insurance

This graph shows percentage of Massachusetts residence without healht insurance from 2000 to 2009.  The percentage of Massachusetts residents without health insurance in 2000 was 5.9% and it decreased in FY09 to 2.7%.

Source:  Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy.  Key Indicators Report. November, 2009.

Across our state, we have seen how our residents have benefited from health care reform.  Because of the steps we have taken to make health insurance more affordable and accessible, there are countless people throughout the Commonwealth who have access to their own doctor – or life-changing medications or procedures – for the first time.  We see gains in access to preventive care, less underinsurance, and a stronger financial safety net protecting our residents against an unconscionable situation of bankruptcy due to medical costs. 

Health care reform benefits not just our residents but also our economy.  Healthier people mean a more productive workforce for the Commonwealth.  Likewise, investing in health care strengthens our world-renowned medical sector – a source of daily medical miracles; an engine for job creation; and a magnet for research dollars and human talent.  The Administration’s separate, ground-breaking investment in life sciences creates enormous potential synergies with our commitment to health care reform, together ensuring Massachusetts’ status as the world leader in health care.

The Administration has carefully managed the finances of health care reform, delivering expansions in coverage without breaking the back of the state budget.  Independent, non-partisan analysis underscores that the incremental state costs of health care reform have been moderate and in line with original expectations.  The model is working as intended – with the costs of expanding state coverage partly offset by lower expenses for uncompensated care; a continuing strong financial partnership with the federal government; and an enduring commitment by the vast majority of our employers to offer coverage to their employees instead of relying on the state to do so.

Employers Offering Health Insurance:

Massachusetts Compared To The Nation

A bar chart depicting Massachusetts Employers Offering Health Insurance versus National Employers for the following years:

2001  MA 69%, US 68%
2003  MA 68%, US 66%
2005  MA 70%, US 60%
2007  MA 72%, US 60%
2009  MA 76%, US 60%

Source: Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy.  Results from the 2009 Employer Survey. January, 2010.

Even with the national economic downturn, the public and a broad coalition of stakeholders has continued to support health care reform, which the Administration has protected during a dramatic downturn in state tax revenues.

Governor Patrick’s and Lieutenant Governor Murray’s fiscal year 2011 budget maintains our commitment to health care reform and builds on this story of success.  Health care reform sets Massachusetts apart – cementing our reputation as a world leader in health care, a policy innovator, and a caring Commonwealth.  Whatever the economic and fiscal pressures, we have not backed away from health care reform.  Our state cannot afford to do so without jeopardizing the health of its residents.

The Administration’s fiscal year 2011 budget preserves eligibility for state health insurance programs – because over a million residents of this state rely on that coverage; our economy needs us to invest in the health of our residents; and our values demand it.  Across state health programs, the Administration is devoting resources to allow more people who need access to coverage to enroll.  We are also minimizing additional cost-sharing for our residents, recognizing that, in these challenging times, people need relief from health care costs, not additional burdens. 

These policies embodied in our fiscal year 2011 budget proposal – filed amidst continuing economic and fiscal challenges – directly reflect the Governor’s commitment to health care.  These goals are accomplished through prudent purchasing, innovative approaches to get the best value for every dollar of state health care spending and the likely success of our coordinated efforts with other states to secure an extension of the enhanced Medicaid matching funds that the Governor first delivered a year ago.

The fiscal year 2011 budget is an important statement of the Administration’s continuing commitment to health care reform.  But the Administration’s efforts to improve the quality and affordability of health care extend well beyond the state budget.

In particular, the Administration inherited a longstanding, national and state problem of rapidly growing health care costs for families, businesses (particularly small businesses) and government – escalating at rates that outstrip their capacity to keep up.  This problem was not created by health care reform, but it does threaten the long-term sustainability of reform and, more fundamentally, force harmful choices between paying for health care and meeting other family needs, creating jobs or investing in other important public priorities. 

Governor Patrick has rolled up his sleeves and begun the hard work of health care cost containment.  His Administration has broken new ground on health care payment reform, securing unanimous endorsement of a nationally heralded blueprint to reward value instead of volume when it comes to paying for health care.  Moreover, responding directly to concerns raised by small businesses, the Governor has launched a series of intensive hearings by his Division of Insurance on health insurance premium increases and the factors that drive them.

Just as has been the case with health care reform, the cost containment initiatives launched by Governor Patrick have Massachusetts once again leading the nation and charting the path to higher-quality, more affordable health care for all.

Section II. Health Care Coverage

The Administration’s fiscal year 2011 budget continues to fully fund state health insurance coverage.  Despite the significant fiscal pressures facing the Commonwealth, the budget maintains eligibility for state health insurance programs, a marked difference from the approach in prior fiscal crises.


The Massachusetts Medicaid program provides comprehensive health insurance to approximately 1.2 million low-income Massachusetts children, adults, seniors and people with disabilities. Health care reform expanded MassHealth eligibility to children with incomes up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level and broadened eligibility for the Insurance Partnership Program to individuals up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level.  It also restored certain benefits that had previously been eliminated.

The Administration’s fiscal year 2011 budget includes $9.84 billion for the MassHealth program.  This is 6.5 percent higher than fiscal year 2010 estimated spending of $9.237 billion. The fiscal year 2011 budget fully maintains eligibility for Massachusetts residents and funds projected enrollment growth of 3 percent.

MassHealth Average Enrollment
  FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 Percent Increase
HMO 349,042 372,403 400,030 433,152.00 461,868 6.6%
PCC 293,645 302,819 313,047 357,943.00 362,218 1.2%
TPL 185,213 189,229 188,895 152,436.00 155,929 2.3%
Seniors 106,664 108,629 109,761 112,400.00 113,837 1.3%
FFS 161,091 166,204 166,188 164,212.00 162,896 -0.8%
Total 1,095,655 1,139,284 1,177,921 1,220,143.00 1,256,747.29 3.0%
% Change 5.1% 4.0% 3.4% 3.6% 3.0%  


Programs with significant increases include the Children’s Behavioral Health Initiative (CBHI), Adult Day Health, Personal Care Attendants, Day Habilitation and Home Health. The budget also keeps MassHealth affordable for its members.  Due to smart fiscal management and leveraging the most value for our spending, the only additional cost-sharing for members is a $1 increase in co-payments for generic drugs, and this modest increase will not be applied to antihyperglycemics, antihypertensives and antihyperlipidemics (which are used to manage and treat long-term chronic medical conditions).

The budget keeps MassHealth costs affordable for the state and members by maintaining appropriate discipline on rates, introducing new program integrity measures and restructuring adult dental services.  The MassHealth adult dental benefit is restructured to cover preventative and emergency services only, excluding restorative dental services.  This change will not impact children or intellectually disabled members with active cases through the Department of Developmental Services, and all other members impacted by this restructuring will have access to restorative dental services at Community Health Centers through the Health Safety Net.  Revenue initiatives at MassHealth include restructuring payments for prescription drug coverage in managed care plans to achieve higher drug rebate revenues, and expanding the Health Safety Net payer surcharge to Managed Care Organizations serving MassHealth and Commonwealth Care members to provide additional funding for MassHealth and Commonwealth Care.

Commonwealth Care

The Commonwealth Care program was created with the enactment of health care reform.  The program provides health insurance coverage for individuals under 300 percent of the federal poverty level that do not have access to employer-sponsored insurance. Commonwealth Care fully subsidizes individuals under 100 percent of the federal poverty level and institutes a sliding scale of member premiums for those above that income threshold.  It provides health care services through a fully capitated insurance model. As of January of 2010, there are approximately 150,110 members enrolled in Commonwealth Care, excluding the Aliens with Special Status population (see next section on Commonwealth Care Bridge).

This graph shows enrollment in the Commonwealth Care program from December 2007 through January 2010. In September 2009 it appears as though enrollment went down but that is strictly due to the fact that the Aliens with Special Status population was terminated from CommCare.

The budget fully preserves current eligibility for Commonwealth Care and provides $838 million to fund additional enrollment in the program in fiscal year 2011 (to fund over 20,000 additional members in the program from current enrollment levels).  The budget does not include any increases in Commonwealth Care enrollee premiums.  Plan Type 1 co-payments would increase by only $1 for generic drugs, consistent with MassHealth changes, with no co-payment increases for Plans Type 2 and 3.  Existing dental coverage for Plan Type 1 members would be restructured in the same manner as MassHealth dental benefits.

This bar graph displays the budget and actual spending amounts for the Commonwealth Care and Commonwealth Care Bridge programs from FY09 through FY11. In FY09, $869 million was budgeted for the CommCare program but only $805 million was spent (this includes the aliens with special status population).  In FY10, the budgeted amount for the Commonwealth Care program is $723 million and the estimated spending is $730 million.  The Commonwealth Care Bridge program will spend $40 million in FY10.  In FY11, the budget amount for CommCare is $838 million and the budget amount for CommCare Bridge is $75 million.

Combined funding of $913 million for Commonwealth Care ($838 million) and the Commonwealth Care Bridge program for Aliens with Special Status ($75 million) is 5 percent more than what was budgeted for Commonwealth Care in the General Appropriations Act for fiscal year 2009. Comparing fiscal year 2009 actual spending and the fiscal year 2011 budget proposal, Commonwealth Care spending (including coverage for Aliens with Special Status) has grown by 6.7 percent on average per year.

Commonwealth Care Bridge

Aliens with Special Status (legal immigrants who have resided in the U.S. for less than five years) lost eligibility for Commonwealth Care in fiscal year 2010, due to the extreme fiscal challenges created by a national economic downturn and the fact that the federal government does not reimburse states for health insurance coverage for this population.  Instead, a separate investment of $40 million was appropriated to provide health insurance for this population.  This coverage is now available through the newly created Commonwealth Care Bridge program.

Commonwealth Care Bridge currently provides coverage to about 26,000 Aliens with Special Status, who were enrolled over a three-month period from October to December of 2010.  Enrollees have been eligible to receive care through a network of providers that fully meets the Connector’s Commonwealth Care network adequacy standards.  While cost-sharing is in some instances higher than that for Commonwealth Care and some benefits are excluded, steps have been taken to reduce any hardships for members.

The Administration’s fiscal year 2011 budget includes $75 million for the Commonwealth Care Bridge program.  This program will continue to be run by the Secretary of Administration and Finance, the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Executive Director of the Connector.

The growth in funding for coverage for Aliens with Special Status reflects the Administration’s continuing commitment to providing health insurance to these legal residents of the Commonwealth.  The Administration’s ultimate goal remains fully integrating Aliens with Special Status into Commonwealth Care.  While that is not possible in the current fiscal environment (particularly given current federal reimbursement policy), our proposed approach for fiscal year 2011 builds on last year’s accomplishments and thus makes progress towards fully reintegrating this population into Commonwealth Care. 

The $75 million proposed for fiscal year 2011 is more than the annualization of the $40 million that will provide coverage for Aliens with Special Status through Commonwealth Care Bridge for about eight months in fiscal year 2010.  With that $75 million investment – and with our intention to be aggressive in maximizing its value – our vision and goal is to expand the capacity of Commonwealth Care Bridge.  The Administration intends to keep the same benefit and cost-sharing structure for Commonwealth Care Bridge, given fiscal constraints and our goal of maximizing capacity of the program, but will continue to take steps to mitigate hardships.

Health Safety Net

Overseen by the state’s Division of Health Care Finance and Policy, the Health Safety Net (HSN) reimburses hospitals and community health centers for health care services provided to low-income uninsured or underinsured residents.  It was formerly known as the Uncompensated Care Pool.  The Health Safety Net is financed by dedicated revenues from a hospital assessment ($160 million) and insurer surcharge ($160 million), other offsetting payments ($70 million) and any state contribution from the General Fund.

Success in expanding enrollment in health insurance through health care reform has resulted in decreased Health Safety Net utilization and payments.  As compared to Uncompensated Care Pool fiscal year 2007, Health Safety Net payments sustained a record drop through Health Safety Net fiscal year 2009 (from $661 million to $414 million).

This chart shows hospital and community health center payment from FY06 through FY09.  The payments have declined by over $225M from $652M in fiscal year 06 to $414M in fiscal year 09.
Health Safety Net Fiscal Year 2010

To help reduce the burden on hospitals in Health Safety Net fiscal year 2010 (Oct. 2009-Sept. 2010) for providing care to the uninsured and underinsured, the Administration intends to dedicate accumulated Health Safety Net fiscal year 2008 and 2009 surpluses (approximately $30 million) to offset 2010 costs.  Absent affirmative steps to retain this surplus funding within the Health Safety Net, these funds would flow out of the Health Safety Net.  Health Safety Net fiscal year 2010 is currently in progress (only one-third complete).  Hospital demand is projected to increase due to the economic downturn (more service use is projected due to the possibility of additional growth in utilization based on past patterns during economic downturns and state policy decisions driven by the economy).

Health Safety Net Fiscal Year 2011

Despite continued fiscal challenges, the Administration is making a $30 million General Fund contribution to the Health Safety Net in its fiscal year 2011 budget proposal – maintaining fiscal year 2010 revenues for the Health Safety Net.  We will continue to closely monitor the Health Safety Net to refine projections for fiscal year 2010 and 2011 demand based on updated information.

Section III. Cost Containment

Cost of Health Care Reform

The Administration has carefully managed the finances of health care reform, delivering expansions in coverage in a fiscally responsible manner.  Since its inception, the incremental net cost of health care reform to the state (net of federal reimbursement) is a little more than 1 percent of its entire annual budget.  As noted by the independent, non-partisan Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, the state cost of health care reform “has been relatively modest and well within early projections of how much the state would have to spend to implement reform.”

Health care reform is working as intended:

  •    We have retained a strong base of employer-sponsored coverage.  76 percent of employers in the Commonwealth now offer insurance to their employees, a figure that has risen since the enactment of health care reform.  This rate outpaces the national average of 60 percent of employers offering coverage.

  •    New investments in state-subsidized health insurance have been significantly offset by decreased spending on care for the uninsured and underinsured.  From fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2009, spending on uncompensated care for the uninsured and underinsured fell by approximately $235 million.

  •    We are leveraging good value for state dollars.  Notably, since the inception of Commonwealth Care in 2006 through fiscal year 2010, the average annual rate of increase in Commonwealth Care premiums per covered person has been held under 5 percent – about half the rate of growth in commercial health insurance. 

  •    We have maintained a strong partnership with the federal government to share the costs of health care reform, including successfully renegotiating our Medicaid waiver to expand federal reimbursement.

This chart shows health care spending pre-health care reform in FY06 and shows spending post health care reform from FY07 through FY11.  It shows a moderate increase in costs over the time period. In FY06, the cost of providing health services for the expanded subsidized populations was $33 million.  In FY07, the total state share was $179 million.  In FY08, the state share went up to $478 million as more people were enrolled in Commonwealth Care and MassHealth.  In FY09, the cost decreased slightly and cost the state $428 million. In FY10, the cost decreased mostly due to the fact that aliens with special status were removed from Commonwealth Care and their funding was decreased from $132 million to $40M.  Overall, FY10 state costs for health care reform are estimated to be $315 million. In FY11, the state share for health care reform is budget at $471 million.

Notes on MassHealth:

MassHealth spending includes eligibility and service changes, fee-for-service rate increases, MCO rates under Section 122, and Section 122 supplemental payments, on a date-of-service basis. No enrollment increases besides those that were directly attributable to eligibility changes have been included in this analysis. Does not include supplemental payments to managed care organizations, the non-federal share of which was funded through local revenues (versus state funds) and which accordingly did not result in state costs. Spending for fiscal year 2010 is projected.

Notes on Uncompensated Care Pool/Health Safety Net Trust Fund:

Spending includes offsets from the Medical Assistance Trust Fund. Uncompensated Care Pool/Health Safety Net spending based on UCP/HSN 10/1-9/30 fiscal year. Health Safety Net payments for fiscal year 2009 is based on latest projection.  Health Safety Net payments for fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2011 are based on available sources. 

Notes on Commonwealth Care:

Commonwealth Care spending is net of enrollee contributions.

Notes on Revenue:

FFP includes FMAP on listed spending and Designated State Health Programs (DSHP), and increased FMAP under the federal stimulus bill. The enhanced FMAP for fiscal year 2011 assumes an unemployment tier 3 for the first six months and tier 2 for the second six months.  Does not include new revenues dedicated to health care reform (e.g., Fair Share assessment, $1 per pack increase in cigarette taxes).

Additionally, the state has adopted a series of carefully crafted, moderate new revenues that are dedicated to financing and sustaining health care reform, most notably a $1 per pack increase in cigarette taxes that has generated revenue for the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund since fiscal year 2009.

Other Cost Containment Initiatives

Massachusetts has a high-quality health care system that is a source of pride and prosperity for our state.  But costs are a major area of concern.  Health care costs are escalating at rates that far outpace every measure of our capacity to keep up.

Growth in Health Spending in MA Expected to Surpass Other Economic Indicators
Index of Health Expenditures Per Capita and Other Indicators in MA, 1991-2020

Source: Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy.  Massachusetts Health Care Cost Trends - Historical (1991-2004) and Projected (2004-2020) November 2009

Our health care costs to some extent reflect the price of high-quality care.  Yet they are also driven by care that is unnecessary, duplicative or even harmful to patients.  Experts believe that approximately 30 percent of today's health care spending produces no benefit to patients. In Massachusetts, we spend a substantial amount of money per year on preventable and unnecessary emergency room visits, hospitalizations and readmissions, while the United States has the dubious distinction of leading the world in duplicative medical tests.  At the same time, fewer than half of adults with diabetes in Massachusetts receive recommended screening and preventive care.  A better coordinated system of care would address the challenges that the health care industry is currently facing (in Massachusetts and nationally).

The graphic demonstrates that Massachusetts falls in the top quartile for access, prevention and treatment, equity and healthy lives but falls in the third quartile for avoidable hospital use and costs.  Other states that are compared include Vermont, Hawaii, Iowa, Minnesota, Maine, New Hampshire, Connecticut, North Dakota, Wisconsin, Rhode Island, South Dakota and Nebraska.

These challenges were neither created by health care reform nor first experienced under this Administration.  Rather, they are longtime national and state challenges, rooted in the fundamentals of how we deliver and pay for care.  Most significantly, the predominant form of paying for health care in Massachusetts has been a “fee-for-service” approach widely recognized as rewarding the delivery of more and more expensive care regardless of whether it is the right care for patients – and promoting fragmentation instead of coordination among doctors and hospitals.  We have become heavily-reliant on hospital-based care, while we underpay and lack an adequate supply of primary care providers. 

Consumers and businesses directly feel the impact in the form of escalating health insurance premiums.  Without comprehensive health care cost and quality transparency – and without any formal oversight and scrutiny of these premiums – they have felt powerless to push back against an unyielding trend of double-digit cost increases. 

Total Median Monthly Premiums for Family Insurance Plans

This graph compares a number of US states and how much the median family health insurance premium is in each.  Massachusetts has the highest median premium in the nation at over $13,000.

Governor Patrick has not shrunk from the steep and complex health care cost and quality challenges that he has inherited.  Rather, he has begun the difficult work of engaging providers, payers, employers and consumers in building a more efficient and accountable health care system that consistently offers our residents the highest-quality care, at a price they can afford.  With these efforts well under way, Massachusetts is once again setting new frontiers in health care policy – blazing the trail to more affordable, higher-quality care for all.

  • Payment Reform:  The Administration has broken new ground on payment reform, leading a State Special Commission on the Health Care Payment System to unanimously endorse a groundbreaking blueprint to reward value instead of volume when it comes to paying for health care. 
  • The current fee for services payment system is compared to global payments in this graphic.  Care is fragmented in the fee for service model, each provider is paid for doing work in isolation.  Global payments allow providers to group and provide a spectrum of care.  Providers are not rewarded for delivering more care but for delivering the right care to meet patients' needs.

    As noted by Nobel Prize-winning economist and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, “So where in America is there serious consideration of moving away from fee-for-service to a more comprehensive, integrated approach to health care? The answer is:  Massachusetts.” (NYT, 7/23/09).  The Administration is now working with stakeholders to develop approaches to implementation – following the consensus-building model that was essential to the enactment of health care reform three-and-a-half years ago – and developing key data and information technology infrastructure needed to launch payment reform. (see below)

  • All-Payer Claims Database:  The collection and distribution of health care claims data is essential to empowering consumers and laying the underpinnings of payment reform (enabling doctors and hospitals to understand their patients’ care patterns and needs).  Currently, multiple state and independent agencies collect claims data, but none receive a full set of claims data from all payers serving Massachusetts residents.  The Administration’s Division of Health Care Finance and Policy is moving forward on implementing an all-payer claims database to promote a broad array of cost containment and quality improvement initiatives involving providers, payers, employers and consumers.
  • Health Information Technology:  More widespread adoption and use of health information technology has the potential to improve quality of care and reduce costs.  If implemented strategically, it can facilitate payment reform by fostering better coordination of care among providers and reducing unnecessary and duplicative testing.  Led by the Administration, the Massachusetts Health Information Technology Council is actively coordinating federal recovery act (ARRA) and state funding to support the meaningful use of interoperable electronic health records and develop the capacity for widespread health information exchange.
  • Health Care Quality and Cost Council:  Under the leadership of the Administration, the Health Care Quality and Cost Council has launched a website (MyHealthCare Options) that provides consumers with cost and quality ratings for hospitals across the state, so they can make informed choices about their health care.  The Council has also issued a comprehensive roadmap to cost containment that reinforces the drive towards payment reform and highlights additional, system-wide opportunities for improving quality and containing costs.
  • Determination of Need: In 2008, the Public Health Council issued regulations that strengthened the Determination of Need Program by guaranteeing proper review of any proposed major outpatient capital project or costly equipment purchase – an effort to reduce health system costs by improving health system planning.  It also required public reporting of medical mistakes and hospital infections and prohibited billing by any provider for care associated with a significant medical mistake.  We know that hospitals and practitioners change their behavior when shown data about errors and unnecessary infections.  Massachusetts is a national leader in barring hospitals and practitioners from charging patients for care made necessary by medical errors.  In this way, we are creating a health care market that is driven by measurable quality outcomes.
  • Premium and Cost Hearings:  For years, businesses (particularly small businesses) and individuals have faced double-digit increases in health insurance premiums without anyone “on their side” asking the tough questions about the causes and potential solutions.  Under this Administration, that has changed.  The Division of Insurance is currently conducting intensive public hearings on health insurance premium increases facing small businesses, focused specifically on work insurers are currently doing to reduce costs and future steps that may be necessary to eliminate the substantial increases impacting the small-group market.  The Division of Health Care Finance and Policy will soon follow up with a series of reports and hearings that broadly examine health care provider and payer cost trends and recommend strategies to address cost drivers.

Section IV. Wellness


The Governor’s fiscal year 2011 budget proposes eliminating the current sales tax exemption for soda and candy.  In addition to generating over $50 million for public health programs, the repeal of this sales tax exemption is a critical first step to discouraging the consumption of these unhealthy items.  Net proceeds from removing these exemptions, along with the $100 million in revenues to be collected in fiscal year 2011 from alcohol purchased in package stores, will be deposited into the Commonwealth Health and Prevention Fund to support critical public health programs.  All other food products that are currently exempt from the sales tax will remain exempt, in line with the exemption’s original intent to ensure the affordability of necessary goods.

The Commonwealth Health and Prevention Fund

Massachusetts has long been an innovator in health care and public health.  The public health programs that serve the people of the Commonwealth reflect the Administration’s commitment to preventative care and wellness services.  $151.7 million ($51.7 million of which is new revenue generated from eliminating sales tax exemptions on soda and candy, while $100 million is from last year’s repeal of the sales tax exemption for alcohol) will be dedicated to the Commonwealth Health and Prevention Fund.  The fund will be used to support critical programs within the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, including:

  • Addiction Control Services: Substance abuse programs work with communities and youth that are at-risk for substance abuse to provide positive alternatives to drug use, critical treatment and step-down services for abusers and guidance and support to families and children of substance abusers.  Additionally, prevention and treatment services for compulsive gamblers, funded in this line item, will continue to assist individuals wrestling with the financial and economic consequences of gambling addiction.
  • Smoking Prevention and Cessation Programs: These programs have helped to produce a dramatic reduction in tobacco use, especially among youth, over the past decade.  These programs will build on this success to further reduce tobacco use and abuse in the Commonwealth.
  • Health Promotion, Violence Prevention and Workforce Expansion: The programs within this service category speak to the scope of the work that occurs at the Department of Public Health.  Programs such as domestic violence prevention and treatment, suicide prevention, sexual assault nurse examiners (SANE), teenage pregnancy prevention, violence prevention grants and grants that support community centers for at-risk youth reduce violence and promote healthy alternatives to risky behaviors.  In addition, these funds will support the ongoing effort to support and promote healthy lifestyles through family health programs, community health centers and disease prevention services.
  • Children’s Health and Nutrition: The health and well-being of the Commonwealth’s children is of paramount importance to the Administration.  The programs supported by the Commonwealth Health and Prevention Fund for children’s health and nutrition include early intervention services for developmentally delayed children, nutrition services for pregnant women and infant children, newborn hearing screening services and palliative care for pediatric patients.
Wellness Fund: FY11
$151.7 Million      
Account Distribution Acct # % Funded from Health and Prevention Fund Total Wellness Fund Spend
Addiction Control Services 4510-0700 100% $81,184,876
Smoking Prevention and Cessation Programs 4590-0300 90% $4,725,969
Health Promotion, Violence Prevention and Workforce Expansion 4510-2500 83% $33,520,467
Children's Health and Nutrition 4512-0120 83% $32,268,688
Total Wellness Fund Spending     $151,700,000


Closing the Tobacco Loophole

Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable death in Massachusetts.  Roughly 9,000 residents lose their lives each year to tobacco-related illness.  It is widely acknowledged that even sporadic tobacco use results in costly and fatal diseases such as cancer, hypertension, heart disease and emphysema.  Low-income populations smoke at twice the rate of the general adult population (roughly 36 percent compared to 16.4 percent).  The costs of treating low-income individuals and the un- or under-insured ultimately fall on the state.  Proactive policy measures to reduce tobacco use serve to reduce spending for treating tobacco-related diseases and allow Massachusetts residents to live longer, healthier lives. 

In most cases, the decision to begin smoking is made prior to becoming an adult. 60 percent of smokers start by the age of 14, and 90 percent of smokers are firmly addicted before reaching age 19 (Foundation for a Smoke Free America, 2010).  Each year in Massachusetts, about 7,000 young people become new daily smokers.  If no more young people in Massachusetts started smoking, about 117,000 young people alive today would be saved from disability and death caused by tobacco use (Making Smoking History, 2010).  Teenagers and young adults are a particularly price-sensitive demographic.  Thus, policies that increase the cost of smoking and tobacco use can help reduce their tobacco use. 

The landmark federal tobacco settlement of 1998 resulted in greater monitoring of tobacco sales to underage users and more explicit messaging around the dangers of tobacco use.  This helped commence the steady decline of overall tobacco use in America.  Massachusetts complemented the achievements of the federal tobacco settlement with the enactment of an additional per pack tax on cigarettes.  Each increase in cigarette prices has successfully accelerated the reduction of smoking and smoking-related disease in the Commonwealth.

Cigarette purchase has declined by 50% in the past decade.  Years in which taxes have been imposed on cigarettes, such as a 75 cent per pack tax in 2002 and a $1 per pack tax in 2008, have had the most dramatic declines in purchase.  In fiscal year 1997, over 400 million packs were sold in the commonwealth.  This past fiscal year 2009 224 million packs were sold in the commonwealth.

In 2008, excise taxes on cigarettes were raised by $1 per pack, with the proceeds dedicated to the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund to pay for health insurance coverage.  However, purchases of cigars and smoking and smokeless tobacco were omitted from this change. The Administration proposes to close this tax loophole to improve public health and make significant gains in reducing underage tobacco use.  The $15 million that will be generated from closing this tobacco tax loophole will be likewise be dedicated to the Commonwealth Care Trust Fund to provide health insurance to low-income Massachusetts residents.

top of page link top of page